FBI[1] agents in the Russia probe had thoughts of arresting a mysterious Maltese professor, but he left the United States before they had gathered sufficient evidence, according to a court filing by special counsel Robert Mueller[2].
Mr. Mueller[3] said the FBI[4] located the professor, Joseph Mifsud[5], in D.C. but did not have enough information to detain him because his contact, former Trump[6] volunteer George Papadopoulos[7], misled agents.
Mr. Papadopoulos[8] pled guilty to a charge of lying about the professor when the FBI[9] first interviewed him in January 2017. Mr. Mifsud[10] skipped town a few weeks later.
The court filing recommends a prison sentence of zero to six months when Mr. Papadopoulos[11] is sentenced on Sept. 7. The special counsel said the defendant should spend some time in prison and noted a similar case brought a 30-day sentence.
While working at a think tank in London after being told he was officially a Trump[12] adviser, Mr. Papadopoulos[13] met with Mr. Mifsud[14] in the spring of 2016. Mr. Mifsud[15] is a somewhat mysterious figure who teaches in his native Malta and circulates among think tanks in Europe, including Russia.
At that time, the public did not know that Russia had hacked and stolen thousands of emails from the Democrat Party and would be posting them through Wikileaks later that summer.
What the public did know is the Hillary Clinton had destroyed 30,000 of her emails that could have had relevance in the probe into her mishandling classified information as secretary of state. There was speculation that perhaps China or Russia or Wikileaks had stolen copies.
Mr. Mifsud[16] told Mr. Papadopoulos[17] he had just returned from Moscow where he heard that the Kremlin possessed “thousands” of Clinton emails.
What Mr. Mifsud[18] meant by that statement has never been made clear....
Mr. Papadopoulos[19] lied, the court filing said, by saying the meeting occurred in February before he joined the campaign instead of the actual April date.“Rather than acknowledging these contacts and communications, the defendant concealed them from the FBI[20]. He lied about their timing, extent, and nature,” Mr. Mueller[21] said.He added, “The lies were material to the investigation. The defendant’s lies to the FBI[22] in January 2017 impeded the FBI[23]’s investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election. Most immediately, those statements substantially hindered investigators’ ability to effectively question the Professor when the FBI[24] located him in Washington, D.C. approximately two weeks after the defendant’s January 27, 2017 interview. The defendant’s lies undermined investigators’ ability to challenge the Professor or potentially detain or arrest him